Labels
Belly button lint
(1)
C++
(1)
Chicken Suit
(1)
Curses
(1)
End of the world
(1)
First Date
(1)
Fresh Perspective
(8)
Iraq
(1)
Late for work
(1)
Life
(2)
Peter Pan
(7)
Politics
(1)
Roman Numeral Calculator
(1)
Severe Weather
(1)
Short story
(19)
Snow White
(1)
Vermont
(13)
Vote
(1)
apocalypse
(1)
art
(1)
corn
(1)
creative writing
(6)
dream
(1)
excuses
(1)
funny
(30)
great white
(1)
jabberwocky
(1)
lewis carroll
(1)
list
(2)
lol
(1)
moral dilemma
(1)
musical notation
(1)
no context
(1)
pants
(2)
philosophy
(4)
ponder
(6)
porta potty
(1)
pranks
(1)
random
(10)
ridiculous
(16)
sci fi
(1)
social media
(1)
texting
(1)
true story
(2)
Showing posts with label ponder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ponder. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Superman
Just thinking out loud here, or whatever the online equivalent of out loud is with the written word, and by written of course I mean typed, and by typed I mean keyboarded or whatever the hell this process is called.
Superman. He's the perfect specimen of a dude, right? All chiseled and square-jawed and whatnot. Here's the thing though: Thanks to some largely glossed-over scientific reason stemming from being from a different planet and somehow drawing power from our sun, Superman is really strong. Not like dude-can-pull-a-car-two-city-blocks-just-by-doing-kegels strong, I mean bullets-bounce-off-his-frikkin-eyeballs-and-shit strong.
Bear with me.
Try to imagine a gym where the weights are such that Superman struggles to lift them.
I find it hard to imagine, because I've seen him frost-breath a lake and then casually lift the several-acre sheet of ice and drop it on a burning chemical laboratory before it 'splodes all up in humanity's business and we go all Ark of the Covenant Nazi melty-face.
Several-acre sheets of ice are, presumably, heavy as shit. Ol' Muscles McSmallville doesn't break a sweat. That's just one example of many.
Here's my point: Muscles don't get bigger if you don't challenge them, right? That's why you gotta lift heavy things in order to build your muscles, or so I've been lead to believe. You don't see much footage of the little Kent boy taking lessons on fitness and nutrition, much less on how to not wear undies over your tights, and you sure don't see him at the gym juggling 45 lb weights as if they were 35 lb weights and he was a slightly less rugged version of himself.
So how did he get all ripped and studly? Even those Mr. Incredible train-car workouts would be as easy as playing inter-continental beer-pong with an inexplicably Nigerian version of the incredible Hulk using Kevlar replicas of Lou Ferrignos testicles instead of ping pong balls.
Wouldn't Superman, for lack of a challenging workout-regimen, be all noodley-armed and concave-chested like a parody of an 80's basement-nerd with a handful of 5.5" floppies? Maybe a super-efficient vegan Superman diet is the explanation for the super-metabolism which makes him naturally Schwarzenegger-in-his-prime-esque without ever tossing back a banana and steroid protein shake or posting Facebook videos of himself doing jazzercise dance-workouts in his living-room in order to inspire his friends.
Admittedly, there's a lot of Superman footage we've never seen, like him butt-clenching a thunder wedgie right out of existence, and then gas-station-burrito-farting a ripe old fissure in his not-so-super tighty whities. We never see him eyeball-lasering two dozen eggs over-medium from a hundred yards away for his post-workout snack, or haggling with Ace Hardware employees over the price of their industrial-strength vice-grips so he can tweeze his super-unibrow. Nobody mentions the time he popped a zit and dented a cast iron tea kettle in a revolutionary war museum three blocks away.
Maybe it's best that we don't think about these things.
Maybe it's best not to consider that baby Clark's super-tinkles could shred an up-armored Humvee through seven layers of Martha Kent's eco-friendly washable cloth diapers, and that his teenage wet-dreams spawned a flurry of otherwise-unexplained immaculate conceptions in Eastern Sri-Lanka and the surrounding area.
Maybe.
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Get Comfortable.
I had fun writing this so I thought I'd share it. It's an assignment I had and I may have put too much thought into it. Get comfortable. And be warned! The assignment was supposed to be offensive and test the limits of my sensitivities. Here's what it was:
Imagine
you are members of a department in Washington in charge of a nuclear
fallout shelter. The Third World War breaks out, and there are threats
of worldwide devastation. The 14 people listed on the board are first in line at your door fighting for space in your
shelter. Because they cannot reach a decision among themselves as to who
shall be left to perish, the decision will be left in your hands. In
the short time you have, only a superficial description of each person
is available. There are enough provisions and space for seven people, and it is highly possible that you
will be the only people to survive the war. Your task is to select
which seven people you will save.
- a 25-year-old black militant who graduated from Harvard
- a Mexican farmer, illegally in the United States/>/>
- a homosexual football star
- a middle-aged religious fanatic, mother of two teenagers
- an attractive lesbian, occupation M.D.
- a sorority girl majoring in fashion merchandise
- a male radical hippie working as an environmental ecologist
- a 59-year-old female community leader
- a call girl
- an obese and balding politician
- a drug dealer from an upper-class family
- a mildly retarded male teenager who is a musical genius
- a handicapped telephone operator
- a male midget
This is what I came up with:
The potential for world-wide obliteration of the entire human race puts a few priorities foremost in the decision of who to bring along. Survival of the entire species rests in my hands here; to err would be to doom all of mankind to obscurity. Seven people to carry on mankind’s glorious tradition of careening towards our own doom. Since the decision has come down to me, and since it’s my shelter that all these mooches will be cowering within, you’d better believe that my name appears atop the passenger list in permanent marker. I took that as a given, and that there are seven additional seats that get to witness doomsday with me.
My
addition of myself to this equation is relevant, since my presence
throws off the male: female ratio by a significant percentage. I'll
keep the count going so we get an idea of what our population looks like
as it's established. So far: Count = me. One man. Seven seats
left. Engage post-conventional moral reasoning skills.
Priority one, when we open the door to the shelter
and witness the devastation wrought by our own inability to cope with
our petty differences, will be to stay alive. It is going to be
particularly difficult given that anything which eliminates all human
life on earth probably did a number on all the other types of life as
well, so food and water will be our most valuable commodity. With that
in mind, the farmer gets the first key. The ability to farm will be
crucial in the coming years. I’ll infer that the farmer is a tough,
able-bodied sort within reasonable breeding age. We do not know if the
farmer is a man or a woman. Count: men 1, unknown 1.
Farming takes a substantial amount of time, and a
more immediate source of food will be needed. With any luck, the wake
of WWIII didn’t contaminate the soil. It’s probably a safe bet that it
left some cockroaches we can munch on. That’ll be fun. Either way,
hunting and gathering will rapidly become the most marketable skills on
the planet, next to fertility and adaptability. The football player
comes to mind as the agile and healthy sort of hunter/gatherer type we
might need. I’m inferring from the list that the football star is a man
based on the word “homosexual” verses “lesbian” used later on to
describe the doctor. The fact that he’s a homosexual throws a wrench
into his value in a society hell-bent on reproduction, but I’ll put him
on the short list as a potential passenger. He may wind up having to
take a few for the team in the name of procreation. Count: men 1,
unknown 1. Short-list: 1 man.
Since every person represents 12.5% of the entire
world population, it becomes vitally important that everyone survive.
As such, the Dr. gets a key. We don’t know what sort of a doctor she
is, but I’ll have to roll the dice and hope she didn’t get her doctorate
in Revolutionary War history. She’s a lesbian, which puts her in the
same boat as the football player as far as how excited she’ll be about
procreation. It will probably be necessary for one of us to pack a
couple of bricks in our carry-on luggage, code named “foreplay” and
“pillow talk”. She’s attractive, which doesn’t really matter but it's a
nice little perk. Count: men 1, women 1, unknown 1. Short-list: 1
man.
We’ve got a 25 year old militant Harvard graduate.
This could be a man or a woman, we don’t know, but I think it’s
probably safe to downplay the “militant” descriptor thanks to the fact
that there will be very few causes left to fight for and the odds are
that whatever was worth fighting over before isn’t worth fighting over
now. Graduating from Harvard is no small thing, so we’ve got a smart,
spirited person of breeding age and unknown gender. We'll be fighting
for our lives. We’ll need all the breeding we can get, and it helps to
have intelligent people around, so this person gets on the short list.
Count: men 1, women 1, unknown 1. Short-list: 1 man, 1 unknown.
The sorority girl is a shoe in just for her sheer
breeding potential. Fashion merchandise expertise will probably not be
highly sought after, but she may be able to make clothes and she's
educated at least to a partial college level. From a strict
survival-of-the-species standpoint she’s a must-have. She’ll be revered
like the ancient fertility goddesses of old, and we will make
lady-Venus statues of her whenever she’s pregnant. We’ll issue her a
sack full of nickels, code named “cuddle-time” in case she goes after
the football player and he doesn’t want to play starting line-up in the
Sugar Bowl, if you know what I mean. We’ll stash some designer tequila
in the capsule to help things along. Count: men 1, women 2, unknown
1. Short-list: 1 man, 1 unknown.
I think it will be very difficult for the
politician to convince me to give up a key. I don’t know if the
politician is a man or a woman, let’s say it’s a man for the sake of
argument. I can’t think of a practical use for politics in a community
of eight. There’s a good chance politics are the reason we went to war,
so maybe we can bring him along just so we can occasionally hit him in
the head with a brick in order to bolster morale. Worst case scenario
we can eat the bastard if times get tough. No… the politician is doomed
to stand on the docks waving a handkerchief as this ship sails.
I'll have to leave the call-girl on the docks too.
Who knows what sort of a person she is. She may be able to crank-out
children, but her specific skill-set is only useful once every nine
months or so and we need people who are useful in a much broader sense.
She's riding on what appears to be a lifetime of bad decisions, so her
credit is pretty well shot. At least she'll be with the politician;
there's a good chance they're already acquaintances, so they can console
each other as they're being vaporized.
The middle-aged mother of two teenagers seems like a
good candidate, if we assume that she knows how to raise children.
Those skills will be extremely valuable, so I wish we knew whether or
not she actually raised her own kids, and if she did whether or not they
turned out okay. She could be a violent crack-head for all we know,
but from what little data we have I’d say we’ll need some matronly
wisdom and she makes the short list. I'm nervous about the fact that
she's a religious fanatic, since I'm not sure what that actually means. She’d be pretty
bummed about her kids getting vaporized in the war, but then again we
all recently suffered the loss of the entire human race, so she’d have
to suck it up and jog on like the rest of us. She might not be excited
about having more kids, but if she could pull that off it would be
huge. Count: men 1, women 2, unknown 1. Short-list: 1 man, 1 woman, 1
unknown.
An environmental ecologist seems like something we
might be able to use, depending on the nature of the apocalypse.
Assuming there's enough to salvage, having a guy around who specializes
in existing in perpetual symbiosis with nature seems like a pretty good
idea. The fact that he's a radical hippie suggests that at least the
shelter will smell like patchouli for the duration of our hunker, which
is fine as long as nobody attempts to leave the bunker in search of
potato chips while the 500 kiloton nuclear device plummets towards
Earth. I'm taking for granted that he is capable of reproduction, since
we don’t know his age, or his sperm count after a lifetime of bong
hits. Count: men 2, women 2, unknown 1. Short-list: 1 man, 1 woman, 1
unknown.
I would love to bring the 59 year old female
community leader for her leadership prowess, but we don't have the
luxury of filling a slot with someone who can't take an active part in
the reproductive process. We've got to keep our little tribe strong and
fertile, or else we curse future generations with whatever genetic
weaknesses are associated with prolonged inbreeding. Her wisdom will be
missed, but we'll figure it out.
The drug dealer from an upper-class family doesn't
have a very heavy resume. The mention of the upper-class family only
makes me believe that this person probably doesn't know how to do
anything useful in a survival situation. We won't be needing a drug
dealer while we're repopulating the world. One dock-pass for the rich
kid with the kilo.
Another for the musically gifted, yet mildly
retarded teenage boy. It's tragic, since he's already had a rough time
of it, but unfortunately fine music is a luxury that comes after
civilization and culture have taken root. His gift isn't compatible
with our mission. We'll have to do the best we can to remember what
songs we knew and pass them on from generation to generation by word of
mouth. New world folk songs will include "The Humpty Dance" and "Brass
Monkey".
I know very little about the telephone operator
aside from the fact that there's some sort of handicap involved. While I
don't know what it is, I do know that we won't be making a lot of calls
after the nationwide telephone infrastructure fuses itself into a 607
ton ball of copper somewhere in Oklahoma. Since the seats are at a premium, and since we don't have any more information, I'm afraid this
person will be vaporized.
Had there been a situation after the final tally
that suggested we needed another male for breeding purposes, I'd have
taken the midget. When I weighed in the possible evolutionary
advantages of fathering small people in a post-apocalyptic world, I had
to give him extra points. Small people require fewer resources, so that
could have been a bonus. As it stands, we don't know what he's good at
other than being small, so he's on the docks.
The final count works out to be exactly eight, so
it looks like everybody who made the short list will be coming along.
Here's the final crew: Me, a farmer, a doctor, a football star, a
Harvard graduate, a sorority girl, a middle aged mother, and an
environmental ecologist. That's 3 men, 3 women and 2 unknown. With any
luck, the farmer and the Harvard graduate will turn out to be a man and
a woman, and we'll have a good balance of people/skills/procreation
potential in our little community. With enough well-placed bricks and
sacks full of nickels, the species may well survive. I would probably
be willing to trade the middle aged mother for the call girl if it
turns out the call girl isn't a lost cause, and the middle aged mother
was a sandwich-sign wearer who yells "SINNER!" at everyone. The rest of the landing party and I would probably agree to
look a little harder at the virtues of prostitution in that case.
Nothing brings people together like the threat of
an impending apocalypse. In our brave new world, where
bricks replace chocolate as the most effective aphrodisiac,
everyone needs to step up and work hard. Hardship strips
away all the extraneous noise and make us focus on what’s really
important, like not dying while babies are being made. Think of the
children, man. Think of the children.
image: unknowingly courtesy of this web address, where I found it. https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1173&bih=807&q=armageddon&oq=armageddon&gs_l=img.3..0l10.548.5360.0.5587.10.10.0.0.0.0.334.1923.2j3j0j4.9.0....0...1ac.1.29.img..3.7.1426.5aAxMi-SCdU#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=zgs6GA9v_kMEPM%3A%3Bgeqr_w1L3Nv6hM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.opinion-maker.org%252Fwp-content%252Fuploads%252F2012%252F03%252Farmageddon.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.opinion-maker.org%252F2012%252F03%252Farmageddon%252F%3B400%3B300
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Insanity Camouflage
Earlier today I saw someone alone in a car talking excitedly. I didn't think twice about it until later, when I thought twice about it.
Remember back in the dark ages before cell phones, when if you saw a guy walking around talking to himself you automatically thought he was a nut-bar? I know I did, but not anymore. Now I automatically assume he's on the phone and is enjoying the convenience of some sort of hands-free device.
The thing that gets me is that the original nut-bars are still out there wandering around talking to themselves, but nobody notices. Our culture has developed in such a way that certain crazy behavior no longer appears crazy. We've camouflaged ourselves to more closely resemble the mentally unstable.
Another example: There were six or eight people in a waiting room the other day, including me, and every single one of us was sitting motionlessly staring at the small square of plastic in each of our hands. Fifteen years ago that sort of behavior would have seemed decidedly odd.
Today, if a genuinely insane person was sitting in that waiting room talking to himself, or staring intently at a piece of plastic in his hand for long periods of time, nobody would even notice.
That's lucky for him.
Friday, June 7, 2013
Communications Breakdown (Not the song)
There's a gap in my ability to effectively communicate, and it bugs me.
I need a new way to express my delight via text. People send me funny things or post them to various social media platforms or whatever all the time. Sometimes I really get to laughing about whatever it is, and want to let whomever sent it know how much it made me laugh, but there isn't a great way to do that...
All the usual ways are overused, lol, rofl, lmfao, roflmao, bwaahahaha, teehee, etc. etc... I don't know about you, but I've used all of these while remaining completely expressionless. They're used so much that when I see those expressions posted I don't believe them at face value even a little bit. You know what I mean?
I need something that actually means I'm laughing, not that I find something somewhat amusing. If I just say it, like "That actually made me laugh!" it comes off as a little conceited, as if I'm saying "It's unusual for something to make me laugh and I'm surprised that the thing you sent me was able to penetrate my defenses", which is in no way true.
Maybe "That actually made me laugh!" will become "tamml". I hope not, or it will eventually go the way of "lol" which used to mean "I'm laughing out loud" but which now basically means "I am amused" without sounding so uppity. "lol" is punctuation now. That's not what I need here.
There must be a simple solution. Here are a few ideas:
IJSMPLSH = "I just shit my pants laughing so hard"
ETIAIBICSL = "Everyone thinks I'm an idiot because I can't stop laughing"
HCIPM = "Holy crap I peed myself"
MFHN = "My face hurts now"
YBYJMCSOMN = "You bastard you just made coffee shoot out my nose"
That makes me wonder if there shouldn't be similar little abbreviations for expressing the fact that something wasn't funny at all, for example:
TWFAA = "That wasn't funny at all"
YAI = "You're an idiot"
IDTWCBFA = "I don't think we can be friends anymore"
GOMOE = "Gouging out my own eyes" (I rather like this one)
It's up to you, go forth and spread the word!
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Birds are Dumb
First of all, nests are stupid. Rain, snow, hail, and whatever else that falls out of the sky is going to land directly in your "shelter". That's dumb! Why not put a roof on it?
Who sits in a bowl in a tree during a rainstorm and says "Wow, I can't believe how warm and dry I feel! Nothing cozier than a bowl made out of sticks, in the top of a tree!" Stupid birds.
Then in order to keep the kids warm, you gotta sit on them. Literally sit directly on them. Birds make the best babysitters. Then when the eggs hatch, you throw up pre-chewed worms and bugs directly into their mouths. Are they grateful? Probably not.
"Moooom! I'm huuuuungry!"
"Aww, here you go sweetie, *hork-hork-hork-blatt!*"
"Golly, thanks mom, you're swell!"
Then it's all cold, freak spring snowstorm, the kids start squirming around, poking you in the butt with their beaks and you're all like "Hey! I've got four inches of snow on my head up here, do you mind?", and they're down there chirping all sarcastically back at you, like "Ooh, poor me, I've got snow on my head, boo boo boo!" because they're mocking birds and that's how they are.
So you kick them out of the nest like "Figure it out!" and half of them plummet to their deaths. The other half go on to make all the same stupid mistakes that you made.
"This is the way my parents did it, and this is the way I'm gonna do it!"
"But wouldn't it be smarter to put a roof on the house?"
"Dagnabbit, you youngsters don't know what's good for you!"
"But.... "
"Shut up!"
"But..."
"Aaaaaaah! Aaaaaaah! Damn kids!" *shakes wing furiously*
Hopeless.
Saturday, February 2, 2013
Another Dead Language In Our Midst?
I was writing an essay tonight and thinking about how tricky it is to get my words to have the right "voice". It occurs to me that as advanced as our written language may be, it is still sadly lacking in what a musician would refer to as "timbre". There's no way to tell what the writers voice would actually sound like if you could hear them speaking. Was he or she a smoker? Nasal? Loud, quiet, obnoxious?
In music, timbre is expressed through the use of various instruments. There are only so many voices, as limited by the instruments. A note played by a trombone sounds different than the same note played by a flute. How does a writer convey the sound of their voice?
"Bollocks!" he said, in his raspy, yet oddly soothing and somehow nasal voice. What does that sound like? It's up to the reader to plug in those variables and make a voice for the speaker. I imagine it's just as hard, if not harder for a musician.
How hard is it for a musician to translate their music into a readable medium? The great composers of the past; Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, etc, etc, etc.. were all forced to "speak" the same written language. Musical notation is mankind's best effort when it comes to writing down what music is supposed to sound like. It's brilliant, and detailed, and complicated, but is it good enough? Look at this:
It takes a trained musician to be able to even begin to decipher this in order to duplicate what the composer was trying to say. Yet every orchestra will play it a little bit differently, because there is a level of interpretation required.
I submit that things have changed. Whereas once a musician had to annotate everything precisely and had to use every trick available in the language of written music in order to convey what he or she was trying to convey, today all a musician needs to do is have any number of easily accessible forms of mufti-media.
Anyone can listen to a recording of anyone else and know exactly what that artist intended the music to sound like. Is the language of written music a dying language? I wonder.
After a massive electromagnetic pulse, will there be enough of our music recorded in hard copy for someone to be able to accurately reproduce it in 500 years? Or are we depending on digital recordings of everything to survive the ages?
I wonder.
In music, timbre is expressed through the use of various instruments. There are only so many voices, as limited by the instruments. A note played by a trombone sounds different than the same note played by a flute. How does a writer convey the sound of their voice?
"Bollocks!" he said, in his raspy, yet oddly soothing and somehow nasal voice. What does that sound like? It's up to the reader to plug in those variables and make a voice for the speaker. I imagine it's just as hard, if not harder for a musician.
How hard is it for a musician to translate their music into a readable medium? The great composers of the past; Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, etc, etc, etc.. were all forced to "speak" the same written language. Musical notation is mankind's best effort when it comes to writing down what music is supposed to sound like. It's brilliant, and detailed, and complicated, but is it good enough? Look at this:
It takes a trained musician to be able to even begin to decipher this in order to duplicate what the composer was trying to say. Yet every orchestra will play it a little bit differently, because there is a level of interpretation required.
I submit that things have changed. Whereas once a musician had to annotate everything precisely and had to use every trick available in the language of written music in order to convey what he or she was trying to convey, today all a musician needs to do is have any number of easily accessible forms of mufti-media.
Anyone can listen to a recording of anyone else and know exactly what that artist intended the music to sound like. Is the language of written music a dying language? I wonder.
After a massive electromagnetic pulse, will there be enough of our music recorded in hard copy for someone to be able to accurately reproduce it in 500 years? Or are we depending on digital recordings of everything to survive the ages?
I wonder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)