Herein I address two questions about meteorological phenomena, which are: "How do you explain these clouds?" and "Is this weather due to HAARP?" I offer four possible answers to the former, and one somewhat longer (and equally possible) answer to the latter.
How do you explain
these clouds?
1:
The clouds are being made in an attempt to curb the (reasonably
well-documented) dwindling population of Italian honey bees. Scientific studies show that the bees are
most comfortable when not exposed to direct sunlight, so the clouds are made so
as to provide them shade. As an added
bonus (and this was discovered after the fact), the honey produced by shaded vs
exposed bees is stronger in its capability to curb the onset of seasonal allergies
in children 11 and under. An absence of
the shade-clouds is usually the result of successful corporate lobbying by one
of two major pharmaceutical companies whose financial stability is threatened
by the idea of an allergy-free population.
2:
Due to the fact that its axial rotation is prone to a slight wobble, the
fluid resistance of the earth’s liquid iron core affects subtle changes in the
orientation of the lines of magnetic flux between the North and South poles. This phenomenon induces variations in Earth’s
Coriolis force, which translates into uniquely striated areas of atmospheric
pressure over a long enough timeline.
Consequently, it results in some
interesting cloud formations.
3:
It is well known that the tides are the result of lunar gravitational
influence. Less widely understood is the
moon’s effect on moisture particles in the atmosphere. It was, until recently, difficult to observe
gravitational effects on gaseous substances at great distances. Now, thanks to tremendous advances in sensing
equipment and rigorous adherence to the scientific method, lunar influence can
now be factored into what was previously a terrestrial, and consequently
somewhat limited, meteorological mindset.
The moon has been shown to cause gravitational acceleration on
atmospheric molecules. The clouds
visible today are the direct result of that influence.
4:
These clouds the result of long-term unintentional human interference,
namely pet owners. One of the key ingredients
in pet shampoo is anti-fungal chlorhexidine.
This chemical, when applied in dense enough population samples, is
injected into the air-stream attached to dander.
Once it mixes with the chlorofluorocarbons left over from over-use of Aqua
Net in the 80s (which still continue to wreak havoc on the Antarctic ozone,
causing an up-spike in cases of penguin sunburn and spurring the birth of the penguin-specific
sunblock industry), it bonds into a new substance called
chloroflourochlorhexcarbonidine, which acts as a condensing agent and prevents
natural dissipation of water vapor.
Is this weather due
to HAARP?
Yes, although the effect is
indirect and unintentional despite some of the more popular conspiratorial accusations
made by a legion of what amounts to the armchair quarterbacks of meteorological
science, whose basic internet savvy is, in a word, questionable. What is actually happening is that the
influence of HAARP-induced changes in the ionosphere are periodically mistaken
for intercontinental ballistic missile launch signatures by long range missile
defense radar systems in eastern Yakutsk.
Somewhat problematically, these
false alarms trigger automatic responses of world-ending nuclear violence in
the form of retaliatory ICBM launches.
These of course must be intercepted, and the most effective method in
use to-date is the deployment of high powered lasers fired from geosynchronous satellites
put in place during the second red scare in the 1950s. The lasers burn the particles in the upper
atmosphere over great distances, creating long pockets of high temperature air. Depending on the wind speed and direction,
these thermal disturbances can either dissipate or converge, trapping moisture
and creating unnatural-looking clouds and nonseasonal weather.
Interestingly, the acronym “HAARP” (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) was
constructed so that it would be reminiscent of the music of the angels which,
as the gaze of scientific advancement turned heavenward, was deemed apropos. It was a marked improvement over the name originally
posited by the scientific community, which was Solar-Oriented Unilateral
Perspective on Continental Auroral Nuances, or “SOUPCAN”.
Know this: No research whatsoever backs up any of my claims.
No comments:
Post a Comment